JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 9, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Luz Elena Garces Bueno Vs. Empresa Nacional De Telecomunicaciones En Liquidacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander Y El Juzgado Septimo Penal Municipal De Bucaramanga. Ordena A La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander Asumir El Tramite De La Accion Constitucional
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Interpretación
  • No faculta a ningún juez de tutela para declararse incompetente
  • Determina la autoridad judicial que debe asumir sin mayores dilaciones
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Acción De Tutela
  • Juicio sobre existencia o no de autoridad accionada o responsabilidad de tutelados es asunto para determinar al momento de dictar sentencia y no para efectos de reparto
  • Personas contra quien se dirige
3 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Santander que asuma, de forma inmediata, el tramite de la accion constitucional de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.